|Will RBC ever fully digest PH&N?
Friday July 27, 2012
As you might remember, Royal Bank of Canada acquired independent
Vancouver-based fund manager Phillips Hager & North Investment
Management back in February 2008. Certainly, many loyal PH&N
clients remember that fateful day. The acquisition, in line
with an industry trend, was meant to generate economies of scale,
more investment choice, less paperwork, and increased profit
for the financial institutions involved. That’s the theory.
Sometimes the reality plays out a bit differently.
Normally what happens is that both companies continue to operate
separately for six months to a year before a full merger takes
place. so that advisors can offer both groups of investments
to their clients and clients will get one set of statements
rather than two. In addition the advisor won’t have to duplicate
all the transactional documentation which is a win-win for all
For example, in February 2011 AGF Management Ltd. bought the
Acuity funds, and about eight months later the funds were all
merged so that advisors and clients could access both companies’
funds. That time frame was pretty standard. Not the best, not
Now what about that PH&N takeover? Remember, it took place
in 2008. I recently was in the process of moving assets to RBC
and planned to use both RBC and PH&N funds to take full
advantage of the two investment disciplines. To my dismay, I
discovered this just wasn’t possible in a client-held account.
In fact, I would have to duplicate all the transfer documents,
all the client applications with each company, and the purchase
orders with Portfolio Strategies Corporation (the company I
work with). More than four years after the purchase (which,
incidentally, was a good one), advisors can’t access both fund
company products without a needless duplication of paperwork.
If the nuts and bolts of this particular transaction were too
difficult to amalgamate, perhaps they should have backed off
and let an outfit like CI Investments Ltd. or Invesco make the
This means that independent financial advisors and their clients
can’t really benefit from the PH&N purchase four years after
the fact. The only benefit thus far is derived by synergies
behind the scenes (many less operational duplication). Does
this mean the biggest bank in Canada doesn’t have the wherewithal
to bring the companies together as one operating unit with two
(or more) distinct investment fund platforms? It seems so.
When I call RBC, they answer as RBC/PH&N. I get a quarterly
booklet with RBC funds and PH&N funds lumped together. My
wholesaler (the representative from RBC who periodically visits
me to update me on what’s happening with RBC) doesn’t say, “By
the way, you can’t offer both fund companies together because
they operate as two different entities.” All this would lead
me to believe they are operating as one unit, which I would
expect after four-plus years. Wrong. “Never assume” is the old
adage that comes to mind.
My advice to RBC is to get your act together, and fix this
problem so the little guy (millions of us retail investors and
advisors) can benefit from your acquisition of PH&N. I still
believe RBC has a lot to offer. It’s one of the best-performing
and lower-cost mutual fund platforms in the country and a solid,
reliable brand that ranks as one of the strongest in Canada
– if not the strongest.
Generic Mutual Fund Disclaimer
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses
all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read
the simplified prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are
not guaranteed and are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance
Corporation or by any other government deposit insurer. There
can be no assurances that the fund will be able to maintain
its net asset value per security at a constant amount or that
the full amount of your investment in the fund will be returned
to you. Fund values change frequently and past performance may
not be repeated.
Personal Opinions & Recommendations Disclaimer
The foregoing is for general information purposes only and
is the opinion of the writer. This information is not intended
to provide specific personalized advice including, without limitation,
investment, financial, legal, accounting or tax advice. However,
please call the author to discuss your particular circumstances.